Sagarika Pradhan

 

The narratives show that the medium itself is unsuitable for the students with diverse needs, and in the face of policy changes and an increasing stress on digital education as being more participatory, the reality presents a rather complex and contradictory picture.

 

Tactile tiles meant to help visually challenged in Delhi University


As the COVID-19 pandemic brought the world to a standstill, educational institutions shifted to  online mode of teaching and learning. This article looks at the experience of schooling among disabled students through multiple cases, noting difficulties ranging from inaccessibility to unsuitability of the medium itself. It argues for a diverse and multiple conceptualisation of disability, whilst looking at individual needs. Further, the article notes the experience of parents juggling with schooling and work, with a shift in responsibilities and expressing inadequacy of the digital medium for their child’s education. The important question then remains as to what happens when digital education is actually accessible to disabled students? The narratives show that the medium itself is unsuitable for the students with diverse needs, and in the face of policy changes and an increasing stress on digital education as being more participatory, the reality presents a rather complex and contradictory picture.

 The COVID-19 pandemic has given rise to a gamut of problems, from the impending health crisis to its consequent effects experienced in personal, social, economic, political and public life. Changes in forms of social interactions, labour market experiences, and domestic concerns are being faced by everyone. Changes in the educational experiences have impacted the youth. . With states going for lockdown measures to prevent the spread of the virus, educational institutions shifted to an online mode of teaching and learning. Digital education is being hailed as a ‘savior’ in this time of crisis by preventing a possible halt in the educational process. However, this transformed reality brought forth glaring inequalities present in the Indian social structure, with evidence of digital divide emerging from various sections and corners of the country.

Questions of accessibility and possession of digital means and required materials exposed the embedded inequalities present in terms of caste, class, gender and regional divides. Students with disability found themselves within this deprived population, where an intersection of the above mentioned disadvantaged identities, as well as the lack of appropriate tools and basic amenities for meeting their specific educational needs, have presented insurmountable obstacles. A recent survey called ‘Digital education in India: Will students with disabilities miss the bus?’ conducted by a community-based organisation Swabhiman, working in partnership with Centre for Advocacy and Research (CFAR), revealed that students with disabilities are having negative experience of online education. They experience difficulties coping with lessons, accessing required technologies, along with affordability issues, especially among those belonging to poor families and regions. All of these may translate into 43 lakh students dropping out of schools. Given this grim reality, it becomes essential to understand what the experience of disabled students has been, and how they are coping while trying to maintain their educational trajectories. Also, with a shift to online education, a merge of the domestic-familial sphere with the formal institutional sphere of education has occurred., This has led to a shift in the responsibility towards parents and caretakers, especially with regard to students who need assistance in these tasks due to developmental, intellectual, visual or hearing disabilities, among others. Hence, with a shift in the mode and space of education, the experience of parents here is intertwined with the experience of students. This too needs attention.

Most importantly, it is imperative to understand and acknowledge that there is no singular state of disability, as a diversity of ‘disabilities’ and experiences are present. Students with intellectual disability, ADHD, or say hearing, speech, visual or locomotor disabilities, may have varied experiences in social life and schooling, with differential needs and requirements that have to be met. Does a blanket mode of digital education prove to be beneficial and conducive for all? Is it democratic and participatory in nature when it comes to students with disabilities, which the digital space is otherwise celebrated for?

 Naresh (name changed) is a parent of 15 year old Suman (name changed), who falls within the severe category of the Autism Spectrum with ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder) and a speech disability, and attends a special education centre. Her typical day follows a schedule, where going to school and following through her classes is part of it. Given her disabilities, any disturbance in the structure of her schedule, can lead to disarray, and a resultant spoilt mood causing her great distress.  

 Naresh explains, ‘Suman is used to a routine and schooling provided a sense to it. She takes multiple classes in school, which are as per her needs and the level of her disability. She has classes ranging from vocational training to occupational therapy, speech therapy, ADL (Activities of Daily Living), among others. Since the lockdown, her classes have gone online, but it has been a real challenge for us. The digital mode has been difficult for her to adjust to, and given her needs, she becomes easily irritable without physical medium of teaching, resulting in her behaviour being erratic at times. Given her hyperactivity, classes such as occupational therapy, which use specific instruments and equipments for students, are essential for her, but this cannot be met through online classes. Teachers are doing their best to come up with alternative methods and exercises, but these are not an effective substitute. Even at home, there is no proper infrastructure for us to do anything; her school was the only place where she got these facilities. We are doing as much as we can, but she sure is not benefitting much’.

In the above narrative one notes how online education, rather than being empowering, has not just been limiting, but unfavorable for Suman. For students like Suman, schooling provides a sense to their everyday lives. It is also a space for social and public engagement, with school being the foremost sphere where she could mingle with her peers and other social actors, but this is restricted now. Thus, schooling is not just about delivery of skills and knowledge, but a space for social engagement and communication, which is essential for students.  Sahej (name changed) is a fifth grade student studying in a mainstream school, who has partial visual impairment that requires him to take additional assistance when it comes to online education. In a classroom setting, the seating arrangement takes care of his needs, as having a place in the front helps him to read and to understand the writing on the board. But during online lessons, the distance between the camera and the board his teacher uses, coupled with poor connectivity issues, causes him immense trouble concentrating, and in addition to this, long hours of digital engagement have a negative impact on his eyesight, as he complains of his eyes hurting too much.

Students with visual and hearing impairment may also face problems as they rely on physical touch as sensory engagement to understand and communicate, where digital education is ineffective. Students with dyslexia also find it difficult as one to one communication and attention from the teacher has been difficult given the shift to online classes.

 Many students within the Autism Spectrum also face other related developmental issues like struggling with fine motor skills, which require regular therapy and innovative ways to help them perform their daily tasks. Since the classes are now online, they struggle to follow through these activities, and without physical assistance of the teacher it becomes difficult to concentrate. Some of the manageable tasks are taken up by parents in consultation and guidance from the teacher, but given the work from the home directive, many have to juggle between their work and child’s classes. Thus, with schools shut, the parents of students who need assistance are stepping in to take the responsibilities earlier being managed by formal educational institutions, but it becomes difficult at times to juggle these, especially when students require extra attention and engaged interaction in the process.  

School as a separate institutional and spatial entity has its own actors, responsibilities and associative meanings.  These have become dysfunctional in the face of the pandemic, and, hence, the functioning of educational practices itself has altered meanings and experiences. For students with disability, especially those with certain intellectual and developmental disabilities, the organisation and ordering of daily activities in particular spaces is important, but with the shift of space and mode of teaching, they are experiencing not just difficulty following through, but additional stress and mood related issues are also being experienced.

It is important to understand that when it comes to schooling, a conventional ‘one-size-fits all’ educational practice is not what students with disabilities benefit from. A uniform and limited conception of disability proves to be detrimental, where multiplicity and varied requirements need to be acknowledged. Recognition of this would help understand how and why online education may not be suitable for all. A recent report in the Washington Post notes how schools in the US that shifted to an online mode of education have acknowledged that this mode of learning is not favorable for all students with disabilities. Even parents narrate how closing of schools has disrupted the ‘routine’ and particular needs of their children, which only the ‘special services’ at schools could cater to, and they are not trained to do that effectively at home. Organisations like UNESCO and Global Action on Disability (GLAD) Network have taken cognizance of the difficulties and ‘inequalities’ faced by disabled students during this pandemic, recognising that students with disabilities may not benefit much from ‘distance education.’ Thus, specific needs of students require attention. They recommend measures to include all students with disability in the learning process and catering to their individual needs. It is urgent to address the significant rise in dropout rates, and assist both families and educators.  While   discussions at the level of public and policy forums on these issues are on, it is essential that these are realized in practice.      

Thus, a fundamental point that emerges is that even when digital means are accessible, which is difficult given the digital divide, the very medium of instruction may not be suitable for many students with disabilities. However, an altogether suspension of schooling during this period may not be the perfect alternative as well. Extensive research needs to be taken up to understand the situation and how it is affecting students with multiple disabilities. The pandemic has thrown a new challenge for all, and any conclusive measure that is taken needs to be backed with evidence that notes the voices of multiple actors involved in the schooling process. This is all the more important as the National Education Policy 2020 focuses on digital education in schooling as the way forward to ‘include’ everyone in the learning process.  The online classes during this pandemic present a contradictory and complex reality. With multiple disabilities present, a uniform top-down measure will prove to be detrimental. Uniform instructions would not just hamper the development of these students, but is also reflective of the ignorance and narrow conception that persists while looking at disabilities and the diverse needs of students. Decision making itself needs to be more participatory in nature, where the needs and views of the students and their families are taken into account.


Sagarika Pradhan is an MPhil Scholar at the Centre for the Study of Social Systems, Jawaharlal Nehru University. Over the years, she has worked with Tamana, an NGO and Special Needs Education Centre based in Delhi.

 

REFERENCES

...............................

‘National Education Policy-School Education’. 2020. New Delhi: Ministry of Education, Government of India.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-53471749 Accessed on 5th August, 2020.

 

https://www.hindustantimes.com/education/43-lakh-disabled-students-across-states-may-drop-out-unable-to-cope-with-online-education/story-ZAg4a1nyWDluuq4BfV2V0K.html#:~:text=The%20report%2C%20'Digital%20Education%20in,the%20media%20on%20July%2023.&text=A%20total%20of%20the%20survey,be%20dropping%20out%20of%20schools.%E2%80%9D- Accessed on 1st August, 2020.

 

https://gladnetwork.net/search/resources/general-statement-glad-inclusive-education-working-group-response-covid-19-crisis Accessed on 13th September, 2020.

 

https://en.unesco.org/news/including-learners-disabilities-covid-19-education-responses Accessed 13th September, 2020.

 

https://www.ndtv.com/education/covid-19-students-disabilities-struggling-e-learning-ngos-call-for-accessible-approach Accessed on 13th September, 2020.

 

https://gemreportunesco.wordpress.com/2020/03/30/how-is-the-coronavirus-affecting-learners-with-disabilities/ Accessed 22nd September, 2020.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/for-parents-trying-to-replicate-school-for-children-with-disabilities-a-confounding-task/2020/03/19/8a1e2876-6940-11ea-9923-57073adce27c_story.html Accessed on 22nd September, 2020.